It starts innocently. A buyer is walking through a house and asks, offhandedly, what insurance on a place like this would cost. The agent gives a rough number. The buyer uses that number in their budget. The actual quote comes in 40 percent higher. The buyer closes anyway, but now the monthly payment is uncomfortable, the relationship is strained, and if anything goes wrong downstream, there is a paper trail connecting the agent’s estimate to the buyer’s decision.
That is how E&O claims in real estate often begin: not with a dramatic professional failure, but with a casual comment that crossed a line the agent did not realize was there.
Insurance questions from buyers and sellers are coming earlier and more frequently than ever. In a homeowners insurance market defined by rising premiums, restricted carrier availability, and properties that are harder to insure than they appear, the gap between what a buyer expects and what insurance actually costs has never been wider. That gap is exactly where E&O exposure hides.
The Five Statements That Create Liability
Professional liability claims tied to insurance conversations in real estate typically involve one of five categories of misstatement. Each one is common. Each one is avoidable.
“This house should be easy to insure.” Insurability depends on roof age and condition, the property’s claims history, proximity to fire stations, construction materials, and market-specific carrier appetite. None of these are visible from the showing. An agent who implies a property is straightforwardly insurable is making a professional representation that only a licensed insurance professional can make accurately.
“Insurance on a home like this usually runs around X per month.” Premium estimates are underwriting determinations. They vary by carrier, the buyer’s own claims history, the property’s specific characteristics, and coverage structure. A number cited by an agent, even a well-intentioned one based on their own prior policies, creates the impression of professional guidance it cannot back up.
“The roof should be fine.” Roof age and condition are among the top factors carriers use to determine both eligibility and premium. Stating that a roof “should be fine” for insurance purposes requires knowledge of carrier guidelines the agent does not have.
“You probably don’t need flood insurance here.” Flood zone designations can be complex, and whether flood insurance is required, recommended, or optional depends on FEMA flood map designations, lender requirements, and the buyer’s own risk tolerance. Agents who opine on flood insurance necessity are operating outside their scope.
“I wouldn’t worry about the claims history.” Prior claims on a property are visible to insurers through CLUE reports and affect both eligibility and pricing in ways buyers cannot fully anticipate without professional guidance.

What to Do Instead
The right practice for every one of these situations is the same: refer the buyer to a licensed insurance professional, do so early in the process, and document that you did. Five practices that reduce E&O exposure in insurance conversations: never estimate insurance costs; avoid characterizing any property as “fully insurable”; recommend buyers speak with a licensed insurance professional before making an offer on properties with potential insurability concerns; document insurance referral recommendations in writing; stay within the scope of the real estate license. Per the specialty programs coverage that protects brokerages, your E&O policy covers licensed real estate activities, not insurance advice.
Ready to connect your clients with an insurance partner who can support your transactions without creating risk? The team at Tooher-Ferraris has been helping real estate professionals and their clients since 1932. Contact us today to schedule a conversation.





