Mon - Fri 8am - 5pm (203)-834-5900

Trusted By

2500+ Clients

Industry Leader Since

1932

Serving Customers In

38 States

Get A Quote

5 Watercraft Insurance Mistakes Boat Owners Make at the End of Season

  • Personal Lines

September is when boats come out of the water across the Northeast, and most owners think about their watercraft insurance exactly once during the process: when they wonder if they can cancel it. The end-of-season transition is actually when watercraft coverage decisions matter most because the risks that occur during storage, transport, and spring launch are real, and the coverage gaps that cost boat owners money are almost entirely avoidable. Here are the five most common watercraft insurance mistakes made at the end of season.

1. Dropping Coverage During Winter Storage

This is the most common and most costly watercraft insurance mistake. Many boat owners assume that a vessel out of the water does not need insurance, and they cancel or suspend their policy to avoid paying premiums through the winter. The reality is that boats in storage face fire, theft, vandalism, and structural damage from weather events at measurable rates. A boat stored in a marina facility or boatyard is a target for theft throughout the winter. A vessel stored at home remains exposed to windstorm, falling trees, and accidental damage from other stored equipment.

Canceling watercraft coverage during storage also creates a gap that can complicate reinstatement. Some carriers treat a lapsed policy as a new application, which may result in different terms or a waiting period before coverage becomes effective, leaving the boat uninsured during spring preparation and launch, the highest-risk period of the year for operational damage.

2. Insuring at Agreed Value vs. Actual Cash Value Without Understanding the Difference

Watercraft policies are offered on two valuation bases: agreed value and actual cash value. The difference matters significantly at claim time. Agreed value policies pay the stated amount in the event of a total loss, with no depreciation deduction. Actual cash value policies pay what the boat was worth at the time of loss, which for an aging vessel can be substantially less than what the owner paid or what replacement would cost.

Many boat owners purchase the least expensive policy available without understanding which valuation method applies. For vessels with significant market value, including center console fishing boats, performance boats, sailboats, and cruisers in the $50,000 to $500,000+ range common among the clients Tooher-Ferraris serves, the choice between agreed value and ACV coverage can represent a six-figure difference in a total loss claim. End of season is the right time to verify which valuation basis your policy uses and whether the stated agreed value reflects the current market for your vessel.

3. Missing Marina Liability and Wreck Removal Coverage

Standard watercraft policies focus on physical damage to the vessel and liability for third-party bodily injury and property damage while the boat is in use. Two coverage categories that frequently appear as gaps are marina liability and wreck removal. Marina liability coverage protects against damage your boat causes to marina facilities, adjacent vessels, or dock infrastructure while moored. Wreck removal coverage pays for the cost of raising, removing, or destroying your vessel if it sinks and the removal is required by law or by the marina.

These are not exotic coverage extensions. They are standard features of comprehensive watercraft policies that many boat owners do not realize are missing until a marina damage incident or a sinking event generates a removal obligation that their base policy does not cover. Reviewing whether your current policy includes these coverages takes less than five minutes and can prevent a significant uninsured expense.

4. Failing to Cover the Trailer

The trailer that transports a trailerable vessel is a separate piece of equipment with its own coverage requirements. Many boat owners assume their watercraft policy covers the trailer, or that their auto policy extends to cover it. The reality is more nuanced. Auto policies typically provide some liability coverage for a trailer while it is attached to the towing vehicle, but they rarely cover physical damage to the trailer itself. Watercraft policies also vary significantly in whether and how they cover the trailer.

A trailer that is stolen from a driveway, damaged in transport, or involved in an accident while being moved to winter storage may not be covered by either the watercraft policy or the auto policy if the coverage question was never explicitly addressed. Confirming trailer coverage as part of the end-of-season review closes a gap that can cost thousands of dollars when a loss reveals it.

5. Not Updating Coverage After Adding Equipment or Making Improvements

Electronics, outboard motors, fishing equipment, navigation systems, and onboard safety equipment all add value to a vessel above the base hull price. A boat purchased several years ago and insured at its original value may be carrying $15,000 to $30,000 in equipment additions that are not reflected in the current coverage limit. End-of-season storage is the natural moment to inventory what is on the vessel and confirm that the policy limit reflects the current replacement value of the complete package.

This is particularly relevant for vessels where the owner has added a new outboard, upgraded electronics, or made significant modifications since the policy was last reviewed. Equipment additions that are not reported to the carrier may be covered under the base policy up to a sublimit, or they may be excluded entirely. Knowing which situation applies before a loss is considerably less stressful than discovering it during the claims process.

Tooher-Ferraris reviews watercraft coverage as part of every annual personal lines policy review, including valuation basis, marina liability, trailer coverage, and equipment accuracy. Learn more at https://toofer.com/watercraft-insurance/ and https://toofer.com/private-client-group/.

The Boat Owners Association of the United States (BoatUS) publishes consumer guidance on watercraft insurance coverage at boatus.com. The Insurance Information Institute provides an overview of watercraft policy features and coverage gaps at iii.org.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I cancel my boat insurance during winter storage?

No. Boats in storage face theft, fire, vandalism, and storm damage at rates that justify maintaining coverage year-round. Canceling coverage during storage also creates a policy lapse that can complicate reinstatement and may leave the vessel uninsured during the spring preparation and launch period when operational damage risk is highest.

What is the difference between agreed value and actual cash value watercraft insurance?

Agreed value policies pay the stated coverage amount in the event of a total loss, with no depreciation applied. Actual cash value policies pay the depreciated market value of the vessel at the time of loss, which for older vessels can be significantly less than replacement cost. For vessels with substantial value, the choice between these two valuation methods can represent a material difference in a total loss claim.

Does my auto insurance cover my boat trailer?

Auto policies typically extend liability coverage to a trailer while it is attached to the towing vehicle, but physical damage coverage for the trailer itself is not consistently provided. Coverage for the trailer while it is detached, in storage, or being used independently varies by policy. Confirming trailer coverage explicitly with your insurance broker, rather than assuming either the auto or watercraft policy covers it, is the most reliable approach.

Ready to review your watercraft coverage before you haul out for the season? The team at Tooher-Ferraris has been helping boat owners protect their vessels since 1932. Contact us today to schedule a no-obligation consultation — https://toofer.com/contact-us/

Related Post

  • Personal Lines

Around 60% of Homeowners Are Underinsured. Here Is How to Find Out If You Are One of Them.

Around 60% of homeowners are underinsured, meaning their dwelling coverage falls short of the actual cost to rebuild their homes, according to industry estimates cited by Financial Sense in early 2026. Only about 30% of homeowners have increased their coverage to match rising building costs, even though cumulative construction costs have risen more than 30% in recent years. The average construction cost of a typical single-family home reached $162 per square foot in 2024, up from $80 per square foot in 2011. For homeowners in affluent suburban markets where finish quality and labor costs run above national averages, that figure is often higher.

The underinsurance gap does not announce itself. It is invisible during routine claims, a broken pipe, storm damage to a roof, a fallen tree, where the loss falls within policy limits regardless of whether the dwelling coverage is adequate. The gap becomes catastrophic during total losses, when the rebuild cost exceeds the policy limit and the homeowner is responsible for the difference out of pocket. Four misconceptions drive most of the underinsurance problem.

Myth 1: My Home’s Market Value Is My Replacement Cost

Market value and replacement cost are two different numbers that bear no reliable relationship to each other. Market value includes the land on which the home sits. Land is never destroyed in a fire or storm and is never what an insurance policy covers. Replacement cost is the expense of rebuilding the physical structure from the foundation up, using current labor and material costs and complying with current building codes.

In most markets, land accounts for 25% to 50% of a property’s market value. A homeowner who insures a $900,000 home for its full market value is almost certainly overinsuring the dwelling while carrying inadequate personal property and liability coverage. Alternatively, they may have chosen their Coverage A limit based on the wrong number entirely.

The correct number is the replacement cost estimate, which accounts for square footage, construction type, finish quality, local labor costs, and current material prices. Most carriers offer replacement cost estimator tools; independent appraisals provide additional validation for homes with custom finishes or non-standard construction.

Myth 2: The Insurance Company Set the Right Limit When I Bought the Policy

The dwelling coverage limit set at policy inception reflected rebuild costs at that time, using whatever estimating methodology the carrier applied at the time of underwriting. Construction costs have risen sharply and unevenly since 2020. A limit that was adequate in 2021 may be meaningfully inadequate today, because the rebuild cost of the same house has increased while the policy limit has increased only modestly, if at all.

After Colorado’s Marshall Fire, 74% of policyholders were found to be underinsured, and 36% were severely underinsured, meaning their coverage was below 75% of the actual rebuild cost. Those homeowners did not choose to be underinsured. They accepted the limit their carrier set at policy inception, assumed the annual inflation guard increase was keeping pace with actual cost increases, and discovered the gap only when they needed to rebuild.

Myth 3: My Inflation Guard Endorsement Keeps My Coverage Current

Most homeowners policies include an inflation guard provision that automatically increases the dwelling coverage limit annually, typically by a percentage that approximates general inflation or construction cost inflation. The problem is that inflation guard percentages are set at inception and do not respond dynamically to the actual cost trajectory of local construction markets.

Construction input prices, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Producer Price Index, spiked well above general consumer inflation during the 2021 through 2023 period. A policy with a 4% annual inflation guard increase during a period when local construction costs rose 12% is falling behind by 8 percentage points per year. After three years, the gap between the inflation guard adjusted limit and the actual rebuild cost can be substantial. A homeowner who relies on the inflation guard without periodic independent review may not discover the gap until a loss reveals it.

Myth 4: The Gap Is Small Enough to Manage Out of Pocket

The average underinsurance gap is not a rounding error. Research following the Marshall Fire found an average underinsurance shortfall of $139,000 per household. At the high end of the market, including custom homes, renovated Colonials, and estate properties common in affluent suburban markets, the gap between an outdated dwelling limit and the current cost to rebuild can easily reach $200,000 to $400,000 or more.

Two policy features meaningfully reduce underinsurance risk without requiring the homeowner to perfectly predict future construction costs. Extended replacement cost endorsements provide a buffer of 20% to 50% above the stated dwelling limit, covering cost overruns that occur between loss and reconstruction. Guaranteed replacement cost coverage, where available from the carrier, covers the actual rebuild regardless of the stated limit. Both features deserve a conversation at policy renewal.

Tooher-Ferraris reviews dwelling coverage limits against current replacement cost estimates as part of every annual personal lines policy review. Learn more at https://toofer.com/home-insurance/ and https://toofer.com/private-client-group/.

The Insurance Information Institute publishes homeowners market data and replacement cost guidance at iii.org. BLS Producer Price Index data for construction inputs is available at bls.gov.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I find out if my home is underinsured?

The most reliable method is to compare your current Coverage A dwelling limit against an updated replacement cost estimate that accounts for your home’s actual square footage, construction type, finish quality, and current local labor costs. Many carriers provide replacement cost estimator tools at no charge; independent appraisals from a certified appraiser or local contractor provide additional validation. Any significant renovation, addition, or improvement since the last estimate requires a new calculation.

What is the difference between market value and replacement cost for insurance purposes?

Market value is the price a buyer would pay for the property, including the land. Replacement cost is the expense of rebuilding the physical structure from the foundation up at current labor and material costs. For insurance purposes, the relevant number is replacement cost. Land is not destroyed in a covered loss and is not what a homeowners policy covers. In most markets, replacement cost is significantly lower than market value, which means insuring at market value results in overcoverage on the structure and often inadequate coverage elsewhere.

Does an extended replacement cost endorsement eliminate the underinsurance risk?

An extended replacement cost endorsement significantly reduces but does not eliminate underinsurance risk. It provides a buffer of 20% to 50% above the stated dwelling limit, covering cost overruns that occur between a loss and the completion of reconstruction. It does not correct a fundamentally inadequate dwelling limit. If the Coverage A limit is set 40% below actual rebuild cost, a 25% extended replacement cost endorsement still leaves a gap. The endorsement works best as a buffer against post-disaster cost escalation, not as a substitute for maintaining an accurate base limit.

Ready to find out if your home coverage keeps up with what it would actually cost to rebuild? The team at Tooher-Ferraris has been helping homeowners protect their most valuable assets since 1932. Contact us today to schedule a no-obligation consultation — https://toofer.com/contact-us/

Learn More
  • Business Insurance

Directors and Officers Insurance for Private Companies: What Changed in 2026 and Why It Matters Now

Picture this: a mid-sized company has operated successfully for eleven years. A combination of rising input costs, a softening market for its services, and tighter credit conditions has created cash flow stress over the past eighteen months. The business continues operations, takes on additional working capital debt, and makes several asset dispositions to manage liquidity. Twelve months later, the business files for restructuring. The lender, facing a significant shortfall, files a breach of fiduciary duty claim against the company’s management team personally.

The company has general liability insurance. It has commercial property coverage. It has an employment practices liability policy. It does not have directors and officers insurance. The claim against management, for decisions made during a financially stressed period, has no insurance response. The individuals who served as directors and officers of that company are personally exposed.

This scenario is not hypothetical. It is the most common private company D&O claim type in the current market, and it is playing out with increasing frequency as rising operating costs and tighter credit conditions have stressed mid-market businesses across industries. D&O insurance for private companies has stabilized in pricing after years of market correction. At the same time, the three exposure forces driving private company D&O claims are more relevant in 2026 than at any point in the past decade.

The Three Private Company D&O Exposure Forces in 2026

Business insolvency risk is the primary driver of private company D&O claims in the current market. Lenders and creditors facing shortfalls on distressed loans may pursue directors and officers for breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent conveyance, or mismanagement claims, particularly when the financial distress involved continued operations, asset dispositions, or additional debt that benefited equity holders at the expense of creditors. These claims do not require proof that management acted dishonestly. A creditor may only need to allege that management decisions made during a period of financial stress were not in the best interests of the company as a whole. In an insolvency context, that standard can be applied broadly.

AI governance exposure is an emerging but rapidly accelerating source of D&O liability. Directors and officers who approve the use of AI tools for hiring, performance management, compensation, or customer-facing decisions without establishing adequate governance oversight may be creating personal exposure they do not recognize. The EEOC has made clear that “the algorithm did it” is not a valid defense. Employers can remain liable for disparate outcomes produced by AI tools they have adopted, including tools purchased from third-party vendors. As plaintiffs’ attorneys develop new theories for algorithmic bias claims and regulators increase scrutiny of AI governance, directors who cannot document adequate oversight of AI-driven decisions may face personal liability that their general liability and employment practices policies do not cover.

Employment practices claims against individual officers remain a frequent private company D&O trigger. Wrongful termination, discrimination, and retaliation claims that name individual officers and directors, rather than only the company, can fall within the D&O coverage grant. Many businesses purchase employment practices liability insurance without D&O coverage, creating a gap precisely where the two coverages may overlap. An EPL policy generally addresses the company’s liability for employment claims, while a D&O policy can address the personal liability of individuals named in those claims. When both the company and its officers are named as defendants, both coverages may be needed.

Why the Current Market Is a Favorable Entry Point

D&O insurance pricing peaked in 2021 and 2022 following a period of significant claims activity driven by securities class actions and SPACs. Since then, the market has corrected steadily. By early 2026, D&O has stabilized at flat renewals for most private company primary coverage, with some segments seeing modest reductions. For private companies that have never purchased D&O coverage and are entering the market for the first time, the current environment represents materially better pricing than was available two or three years ago.

The favorable entry point has a practical time limit. The insolvency risk exposure currently driving private company D&O claims reflects current economic conditions, including tighter credit, higher operating costs, and softening demand in several industries. If those conditions improve, the urgency of insolvency-related exposure may decrease. If they persist or worsen, D&O claims could continue to increase, and underwriters may adjust pricing accordingly. The opportunity to enter the D&O market while pricing remains stabilized is now, rather than after another wave of claims activity prompts the market to reprice.

What Private Company D&O Coverage Actually Provides

Private company D&O insurance is structured around three coverage components that address different aspects of the same underlying risk. Side A coverage protects directors and officers personally when the company cannot indemnify them, most commonly when the company is insolvent, when the claim involves a derivative suit, or when indemnification is legally prohibited. Side B coverage reimburses the company for amounts it pays to indemnify its directors and officers. Side C, also known as entity coverage, protects the company itself against certain claims.

For private companies, Side A is often the most practically important component. When the business is solvent and able to indemnify its officers, Side B generally responds. When the business is in financial distress, which is precisely the scenario that can generate significant private company D&O claims, indemnification may be unavailable or prohibited. In those circumstances, Side A may be the only coverage protecting the individuals personally exposed by the claim.

The commercial insurance team at Tooher-Ferraris helps mid-sized businesses evaluate D&O exposure, structure coverage that reflects their specific governance and ownership characteristics, and integrate D&O into a complete management liability program alongside employment practices liability and fiduciary liability coverage. Learn more at https://toofer.com/specialty-programs/ and https://toofer.com/commercial-insurance/.

Hinshaw and Culbertson’s 2026 D&O Liability and Coverage analysis provides detailed context on current private company D&O claim trends at hinshawlaw.com. The AM Best D&O market outlook is available at ambest.com.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do private companies really need D&O insurance?

Yes. Private company D&O exposure arises from the same types of governance and management decisions that generate public company D&O claims, but through different claim types: lender and creditor claims in distressed situations, employment practices claims naming individual officers, minority shareholder suits in closely held companies, vendor disputes alleging misrepresentation, and AI governance claims. None of these require the company to be publicly traded, and none are covered by general liability or employment practices liability policies alone.

When is the right time to buy D&O insurance?

D&O is a claims-made policy, meaning the policy in force when a claim is reported is the policy that responds. The right time to purchase D&O is before a claim arises, which means before a financial distress situation, before an employment dispute reaches the individual officer level, and before an AI governance incident generates regulatory scrutiny. Companies that purchase D&O after a distress event begins may find prior acts limitations or exclusions that significantly restrict coverage for the events that prompted the purchase.

How is D&O insurance different from general liability?

General liability insurance covers claims involving bodily injury and property damage arising from business operations. D&O insurance covers claims arising from the management decisions and governance actions of directors and officers, including breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentation, mismanagement, and failure of oversight. These are fundamentally different categories of liability. A business that carries only general liability insurance has no insurance response to a D&O claim, regardless of the size of its GL limits.

Ready to evaluate your directors and officers liability exposure? The team at Tooher-Ferraris has been helping businesses build complete management liability programs since 1932. Contact us today to schedule a no-obligation consultation — https://toofer.com/contact-us/

Learn More
  • Business Insurance

The Commercial Insurance Market Is Splitting in Two. Here Is What That Means for Your Renewal.

The 2026 commercial insurance market is the most bifurcated in recent memory, and most business owners are reading it wrong. Property rates are declining as carrier capacity has returned to the market following several years of catastrophe-driven increases. Cyber pricing is softening as competition among carriers intensifies and loss experience has remained more favorable than underwriters anticipated. Directors and officers liability has stabilized after years of market volatility.

At the same time, general liability, commercial auto, and umbrella and excess coverage are telling a very different story. Loss trends of 12 to 15% are persisting in general liability, driven by social inflation and nuclear verdict exposure. Commercial auto has posted underwriting losses for fourteen consecutive years and continues to harden for fleet accounts. Umbrella and excess capacity has quietly shrunk as reinsurers have restricted their exposure to the casualty lines most affected by social inflation. A business that looks at its total renewal number and concludes the market is softening may be missing significant increases in the casualty lines that matter most.

Where Rates Are Declining and Why

Commercial property has seen meaningful rate decreases in 2026 as carrier capacity returned to the market following the 2023 and 2024 catastrophe seasons. Reinsurance pricing stabilized, allowing primary carriers to compete more aggressively for well-managed commercial property accounts. Businesses with demonstrable property risk management, including updated roofing, upgraded electrical systems, and documented building maintenance programs, are seeing some of the most favorable property renewals they have had in four years.

Cyber insurance has shifted dramatically from the rate environment of 2021 and 2022. Competition among cyber carriers has intensified, and for businesses that can demonstrate strong security controls, pricing has declined meaningfully from peak levels. According to recent market analysis, businesses that implement the five core security controls now required as baseline underwriting standards have seen premiums stabilize or fall 50 to 60% compared to businesses without those controls. The catch: businesses that cannot demonstrate those controls are facing flat denials or premium increases that can exceed 300%.

Directors and officers liability has hit a floor after years of market correction. Primary coverage for private companies is seeing flat renewals in most segments, and for private company D&O accounts with clean governance histories, pricing is no longer moving in the wrong direction.

Where Rates Are Still Rising and Why

General liability is under sustained upward pressure, and this is not a short-term phenomenon. Nuclear verdict exposure, driven by the same social inflation dynamics affecting commercial auto losses, is now influencing general liability pricing. Underwriters are accounting for the growing likelihood of large plaintiff verdicts on claims that might have settled for lower amounts five years ago. Accounts with retail, hospitality, or manufacturing operations, where third-party bodily injury exposure is highest, are seeing the most significant GL increases.

Commercial auto remains the most structurally challenged line in property and casualty insurance. The line has generated underwriting losses in 14 consecutive years, and the forces driving those losses, including claim severity, nuclear verdicts, and vehicle repair costs, are not easing. Fleet accounts that have not invested in telematics, documented driver monitoring programs, and safety training are being penalized at renewal. Those that have built this documentation are receiving more favorable treatment, although favorable is a relative term in a market with sustained double-digit severity trends.

Umbrella and excess capacity has shrunk quietly. Reinsurers have restricted their exposure to the casualty lines most affected by social inflation, and that restriction has flowed through to the primary market. Businesses operating with umbrella limits and attachment points that were set three or more years ago may be carrying programs that no longer reflect current verdict trends. A $5 million umbrella that was adequate for a company’s liability profile in 2021 may be inadequate for the same company’s liability profile today, without any change in the underlying operations.

How to Read Your Renewal in a Bifurcated Market

The most common mistake in a mixed market is evaluating the total premium change and losing sight of which lines are moving and why. A business that sees its total commercial program renew flat may be experiencing a significant property decrease that offsets a significant GL and umbrella increase. The overall result may look acceptable, while the underlying changes represent a meaningful shift in where its protection is concentrated.

Three questions are worth asking before accepting any renewal in the current market. First, which lines are increasing, and what is the stated reason for each increase? A GL increase attributed to general market trends is a different conversation from a GL increase attributed to a specific loss. Second, are the limits and structures on the lines that are increasing still adequate given current verdict trends? Third, have you been presented with alternatives, such as plan design changes, deductible adjustments, or coverage restructuring, or only a rate increase?

The commercial insurance team at Tooher-Ferraris reviews complete commercial programs across all lines rather than treating renewal as a single-number negotiation. Learn more at https://toofer.com/commercial-insurance/ and https://toofer.com/specialty-programs/.

The Insurance Information Institute publishes current market data and line-by-line rate trend information at iii.org. RIMS, the risk management society, provides detailed commercial insurance market analysis at rims.org.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are property rates declining in 2026 while liability rates are still rising?

Property and casualty lines are driven by different underlying loss dynamics. Commercial property pricing reflects catastrophe loss experience and reinsurance capacity, both of which have improved. Liability lines, particularly general liability and commercial auto, are driven by claim severity trends, social inflation, and nuclear verdict exposure, none of which have improved materially. The result is a market moving in opposite directions simultaneously, which is the defining characteristic of the 2026 renewal environment.

How does social inflation affect commercial liability premiums?

Social inflation refers to the rising cost of insurance claims driven by increased litigation, broader legal interpretations of liability, plaintiff-friendly jury decisions, and third-party litigation funding. It affects general liability, commercial auto, and umbrella pricing because insurers must price in the expectation that claims that historically settled at lower amounts will now produce larger verdicts or settlements. The effect compounds over time as prior-year reserves prove inadequate and carriers adjust their prospective pricing.

What should I ask my broker about my commercial program renewal this year?

Ask for a line-by-line breakdown of what is increasing, what is decreasing, and the stated reason for each movement. Ask whether your limits and structures on liability lines still reflect current verdict trends in your industry. Ask what alternatives were considered before the renewal as presented. A broker who can answer all three questions with specifics, not generalities, is providing the level of analysis the current market requires.

Ready to review your complete commercial insurance program in the context of the current market? The team at Tooher-Ferraris has been helping businesses navigate commercial renewal since 1932. Contact us today to schedule a no-obligation consultation — https://toofer.com/contact-us/

Learn More
Scroll to Top

New York Office

New York Office

Connecticut Office

Facebook-f Linkedin-in X-twitter Instagram
Get A Quote
Skip to content